And I came across something interesting.
In the Ashes series of '10-'11 that us Aussies would like to shove out of our heads forever, the English pace bowlers were really good at swinging the ball (especially reverse swing) whereas the Aussie pace bowlers were struggling to do this.
(Disclaimer: I have no idea what 'swing' is, but just go with this, okay?)
Anyway, in Twatto's book, he mentions that there's different type of balls.
There's a Kookaburra, which they use in Australia. It loses its shine after about 10 overs and sucks at swinging.
Then, there's a Duke. Which is what they use in England. And this ball has this awesome shininess that is easy to polish and you can swing the ball all day. (Also, you'd sweat less in England, so the ball would stay dry and hence swing more.)
My point:
Maybe those
Massive freakout.
Those cheaters.
Steve Finn has some answering to do. Especially to me.
And to think... Alastair Cook, the silly mid-on and chief ball-wiperer, didn't even tell me in one of our
What the heck.
I hate England even more.
And this theory may not even be right, but you know what? I don't really care. I'd do anything to throw a bit of mud at them. ANYTHING.
2 comments:
Sorry. It's a nice theory to explain away the dreadful loss of the Ashes at home, but I doubt those horrid Poms could cheat with the balls. The balls look different for one thing and even if we assume that the umpires were blind, I'm pretty sure the Australian batsmen would have noticed. Not that they always looked like they weren't legally blind either. We were just crap. That's why we lost. Sad but true.
Yeah, it sucks. Hopefully next Ashes will be better. :)
Post a Comment